::: Philatelic Domestic Covers :::
|
Back to Domestic Covers.
|
|
A first day cover for the Pictorial Issue, postmarked February 28, 1894, bearing the
full set of stamps issued that day. The 12¢ value of this series was issued later that
year. A few of these first day covers have survived but they are prime examples of
philatelic covers.
Stamp collectors discovered the idea of collecting stamps on cover in the late 1880's.
Then it was a rather unpopular concept as most collectors preferred stamps off
cover. Even so, we find numerous examples of stamps placed on cover for the primary
purpose of creating a cover, rather than for carrying a message. In the modern lexicon
of stamp collecting, covers primarily intended to carry messages are distinguished from
"philatelic covers" by referring to the former as "commercial" uses or "commercial"
covers. For many collectors today, philatelic covers are given less value or credit
than commercial covers so identifying a cover as being philatelic has a disparaging
connotation. Some philatelic covers are difficult to identify as such.
Examples of philatelic covers and other collector inspired concoctions:
|
|
This cover, mailed April 26, 1894 at Honolulu and bearing a 1¢ Scott No. 53, could be
mistaken for a commercial drop letter, except for the next two examples.
|
|
Another cover, mailed the same date to the same address and bearing the 6¢ Scott No. 60,
is clearly a philatelic cover and proves the 1¢ cover is equally philatelic.
|
|
Any hope of treating the 1¢ and 6¢ covers as commercial is completely destroyed by this
cover mailed the same date to the same addressee and bearing the 10¢ Scott No. 68.
These three stamps were available for sale at the post office on the date they were
mailed, but there is no valid rate explanation for the latter two examples.
The next two covers also illustrate how difficult it sometimes is to identify the
philatelic nature of a cover.
|
|
This example of Scott No. 65 with a shifted overprint missing "1893" was addressed to
William Gifford at Honolulu and mailed from Hakalau, Hawaii, on July 23, 1893. Gifford
was a stamp collector and author of an early handbook on Hawaiian stamps. He sent
envelopes franked with scarce overprinted stamps, often varieties, to various towns to
be postmarked and returned to him. Examples of his covers bearing the no period
varieties are also known. This cover went into the collection of John Seybold, a
pioneer collector of stamps on cover.
|
|
Not all of Gifford's overprints were varieties. This example of Scott No. 56 was
mailed from Hakalau on August 28, 1893. Whether Gifford's envelopes contained a
message is unknown, but the primary purpose was to obtain a cover with an unusual stamp.
Another philatelic use is seen on the next cover, postmarked on the final day of the
Hawaiian Postal Service and franked with the last postage stamp issued by Hawaii, the
5¢ blue Scott No. 82.
|
|
The 5¢ stamp overpaid the normal postage rate by 3¢, a sure indication of a philatelic
cover. It bears a bold strike of Lahaina postmark type 255.01 but was mailed at
Lahaina for delivery at Lahaina, so it could have been mailed for just 1¢ as a drop
letter.
SOME OTHER PHILATELIC CONCOCTIONS
|
|
A purely philatelic concoction is this cover bearing a double overprint (one lightly
inked) of Scott No. 70 and a bogus Special Postal Delivery handstamp.
|
|
Another example of the bogus Special Postal Delivery handstamp, dated the same date as
the previous example and bearing a Scott No. 63, sold only in sets to collectors.
|
|
This example of the reprint, Scott No. 51, used on cover may have carried a message,
who knows, but the primary purpose was philatelic because these stamps were issued for
sale to collectors.
|
|
Bisected stamps were explicitly prohibited by post office regulations. The only
commercial bisect dates from 1870-1871, when a half of the 2¢ Scott No. 31a was
permitted for use on foreign mail with a 5¢ stamp to make up the Convention Period 6¢
rate. It is fun to speculate over whether this cover, bearing a bisected 2¢ Scott No.
57, was a locally authorized drop letter for use during a temporary shortage of 1¢
stamps at Spreckelsville. The truth probably is best found in the fact that several
philatelic concoctions emanate from that area of Maui.
|
|
Here is another philatelic concoction from Spreckelsville – a bogus overprint on the 2¢
envelope.
|
Back to Domestic Covers.
|
|
|
Copyright © 1999 - 2004 POST OFFICE IN PARADISE. All rights reserved.
|